4.6 Article

Outdoor Air Pollution as a Trigger for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrests

期刊

EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 494-500

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e093db

关键词

-

资金

  1. Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Epidemiologic studies have reported associations between fine particulate air pollution and cardiovascular mortality or hospitalization for cardiac events. However the evidence regarding the association between air pollution and acute cardiac events, such as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, is inconsistent. Methods: We investigated the association between particulate matter (PM) air pollution and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using a case-crossover study of adults (age, 35+ years) in Melbourne, Australia. We included 8434 cases identified through the Victorian Cardiac Arrest Registry from 2003 through 2006. We excluded arrests with an obvious preceding noncardiac event such as trauma, poisoning, or drowning, leaving only those events that were presumed to have cardiac etiology. Air pollution concentrations obtained from a central monitoring site were used for day of the arrest and for lag 1, lag 2, and lag 3, including the average lag 0-1. Results: An interquartile range increase of 4.26 mu g/m(3) in PM2.5 over 2 days (lag 0-1) was associated with an increase in risk for an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of 3.6% (95% confidence interval = 1.3% to 6.0%). PM 10 and carbon monoxide also showed associations, but not as strong as for PM2.5. Longer lag periods did not show such strong relationships. There was no association of these cardiac events with ozone, sulfur dioxide, or nitrogen dioxide in any lag period. Individuals age 65-74 years old were most susceptible to PM2.5 exposure, while those 75 years and older had the lowest risk. Conclusion: These findings support an association between daily average PM2.5 concentrations and an increased risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据