4.4 Article

Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy Is Not Associated With Risk of All-Cause Dementia and Alzheimers Disease

期刊

EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 83-103

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxt008

关键词

Alzheimer disease; clinical trial; cognition; cohort studies; dementia; estrogen replacement therapy; hormone replacement therapy; systematic review

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [T32-AG000158, T32-MH017119, R21ES020404]
  2. Alzheimer's Association [NIRG 242395]
  3. Horace W. Goldsmith Fellowship at Harvard University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationship of postmenopausal hormone therapy with all-cause dementia and Alzheimers disease dementia has been controversial. Given continued interest in the role of hormone therapy in chronic disease prevention and the emergence of more prospective studies, we conducted a systematic review to identify all epidemiologic studies meeting prespecified criteria reporting on postmenopausal hormone therapy use and risk of Alzheimers disease or dementia. A systematic search of Medline and Embase through December 31, 2012, returned 15 articles meeting our criteria. Our meta-analysis of any versus never use did not support the hypothesis that hormone therapy reduces risk of Alzheimers disease (summary estimate 0.88, 95 confidence interval: 0.66, 1.16). Exclusion of trial findings did not change this estimate. There were not enough all-cause dementia results for a separate meta-analysis, but when we combined all-cause dementia results (n 3) with Alzheimers disease results (n 7), the summary estimate remained null (summary estimate 0.94, 95 confidence interval: 0.71, 1.26). The limited explorations of timing of useuboth duration and early initiationudid not yield consistent findings. Our findings support current recommendations that hormone therapy should not be used for dementia prevention. We discuss trends in hormone therapy research that could explain our novel findings and highlight areas where additional data are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据