4.5 Article

Adsorption immobilization of Escherichia coli phytase on probiotic Bacillus polyfermenticus spores

期刊

ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 66-71

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2011.03.006

关键词

Adsorption immobilization; Phytase; Thermostability; Bacillus spore; Generally recognized-as-safe (GRAS); Feed enzyme

资金

  1. Daeduk Technology Cluster (DTC) project [DTC0050812]
  2. Small business innovative research program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The immobilization of enzymes on edible matrix supports is of great importance for developing stabilized feed enzymes. In this study, probiotic Bacillus spores were explored as a matrix for immobilizing Escherichia coli phytase, a feed enzyme releasing phosphate from phytate. Because Bacillus spore is inherently resistant to heat, solvents and drying, they were expected to be a unique matrix for enzyme immobilization. When mixed with food-grade Bacillus polyfermenticus spores, phytases were adsorbed to their surface and became immobilized. The amount of phytase attached was 28.2 +/- 0.7 mg/g spores, corresponding to a calculated activity of 63,960 U/g spores; however, the measured activity was 41,120 +/- 990.1 U/g spores, reflecting a loss of activity upon adsorption. Immobilization increased the half life (t(1/2)) of the enzyme three- to ten-fold at different temperatures ranging from 60 to 90 degrees C. Phytase was bound to the spore surface to the extent that ultrasonication treatment was not able to detach phytases from spores. Desorption of spore-immobilized phytase was only achieved by treatment with 1 M NaCl, 10% formic acid in 45% acetonitrile, SDS, or urea, suggesting that adsorption of phytase to the spore might be via hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. We propose here that Bacillus spore is a novel immobilization matrix for enzymes that displays high binding capacity and provides food-grade safety. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据