4.5 Article

Comparative thermostability of mesophilic and thermophilic alcohol dehydrogenases: Stability-determining roles of proline residues and loop conformations

期刊

ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 73-79

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2009.04.007

关键词

Mesophilic ADHs; Thermophilic ADH; Thermal inactivation; Thermostability; Proline; Multimeric proteins

资金

  1. Research Council of the University of Tehran
  2. Research Institute for Fundamental Sciences (RIFS)
  3. Iran National Science Foundation (INSF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study demonstrates the comparative thermal, conformational and kinetic stabilities of the three closely related enzymes; the mesophilic yeast alcohol dehydrogenase (YADH), horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase (HLADH), and the extreme-thermophilic Thermoanaerobacter brockii alcohol clehydrogenase (TBADH). The mid-point unfolding temperatures for TBADH and HLADH were at least 10 degrees C and 6 degrees C higher, respectively, than that of YADH. When YADH was completely inactivated by thermal stress, the residual activities of HLADH and TBADH were 70% and 100%, respectively. The optimum temperature (T-opt) activities of HLADH and TBADH were at least 40 degrees C and 55 degrees C higher, respectively, than that of YADH. Due to the higher rigidity of HLADH and TBADH, the enzymatic activation energies of HLADH and TBADH were higher than that of YADH. Geometric X-ray analysis indicated a comparatively higher coil (turn and loop) percentage in TBADH and HLADH than in YADH. Pairwise alignment for TBADH/HLADH exhibited a similarity score approximately 2.5-fold greater than that of the TBADH/YADH pair. Multiple alignments made with ClustalW revealed a higher number of conserved proline residues in the two most stable enzymes (HLADH/TBADH). These extra prolines tend to occur in surface loops and are likely to be responsible for the increased stability of TBADH and HLADH, by loop rigidification. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据