4.6 Article

Exposure of mice to atrazine and its metabolite diaminochlorotriazine elicits oxidative stress and endocrine disruption

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 782-790

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2014.02.014

关键词

Atrazine; Diaminochlorotriazine; Oxidative stress; Endocrine disruption; Mice

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21107098, 21277128]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB126100]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT13096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effects of atrazine (ATZ) and its metabolite diaminochlorotriazine (DACT) on the induction of oxidative stress and endocrine disruption were studied in mice. Body and liver weights decreased in all ATZ and DACT treated groups. Hepatic activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) increased significantly after 1 week of intraperitoneal injection of 200 mg/kg ATZ, 100 and 200 mg/kg DACT. Hepatic activities of catalase (CAT) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) were also affected by the treatment with 200 mg/kg DACT. In serum, the glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and GST activities and glutathione (GSH) content decreased significantly in the 200 mg/kg DACT treated group. Moreover, the administration of ATZ and DACT decreased the transcription levels of key genes related to cholesterol transport and testosterone (T) synthesis including scavenger receptor class B type 1 (SR-B1), cytochrome P450 cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme (P450scc) and cytochrome P450 17 alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (P450 17 alpha) in testes. Furthermore, the treatment with 200 mg/kg DACT significantly decreased the serum and testicular T levels, while the treatment with 200 mg/kg ATZ significantly decreased the testicular T levels. The results indicated that the acute exposure to ATZ and DACT induced oxidative stress and endocrine disruption in mice, and DACT showed much more toxic than ATZ did. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据