4.6 Article

Ginsenoside Rg1 reduces toxicity of PM2.5 on human umbilical vein endothelial cells by upregulating intracellular antioxidative state

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2012.11.006

关键词

PM2.5; Ginsenoside Rg1; Human umbilical vein endothelial cells; Oxidative stress; Nrf2; Heme oxygenase-1

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [30271106]
  2. Shanxi Provincial International Cooperation Fund [2012081046]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ambient airborne particulate matter (PM) is an important environmental pollutant responsible for many human diseases. Oxidative stress is suggested to be involved in PM-induced cell injury. The present study is designed to study unsalutary effects of the organic extracts of PM with an aerodynamic diameter of less than. 2.5 mu m (PM2.5) and protective effect of Ginsenoside Rg1 (Rg1) against PM2.5 on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in vitro. Cytotoxic effects of the organic extract PM2.5 on HUVECs were measured by means of HUVEC cell viability and the generation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). Expression of heme oxygenase-1(HO-1) and Nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and Nrf2 cytoplasm-nucleus location were assayed. The present results showed that PM2.5 (50-800 mu g/ml) decreased HUVEC viability and increased intracellular generation of ROS and malondialdehyde (MDA) in a concentration dependent manner, but increased HO-1 expression without concentration dependence. Rg1 (10 and 40 mu g/ml) diminished PM2.5-induced HUVEC viability, decrease ROS and MDA generation, increased HO-1 and Nrf2 expression and promoted Nrf2 translocation to nucleus in a concentration dependent manner. These results suggested that organic extracts of PM2.5 increase oxidative stress and decrease cell viability; Rg1 antagonize PM2.5-induced excess oxidative stress; HO-1 expression increase and Nrf2 translocation to nucleus may be involved in the effets of both PM2.5 and Rg1 on HUVECs. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据