4.6 Article

Therapeutic efficiency of succimer used with calcium and ascorbic acid in the treatment of mild lead-poisoning

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 137-142

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2010.09.015

关键词

Lead poisoning; Succimer; Calcium; Ascorbic acid; Preschool children; Mice

资金

  1. Liaoning Scientific foundation, China [20102263, 20032063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to explore therapeutic efficiency of succimer used with calcium and ascorbic acid in the treatment of mildly lead-poisoned mice and preschool children. Mice were exposed to lead by drinking water, and then treated with saline solution, 50 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) succimer, 100 mg/kg b.w. succimer, or 50 mg/kg b.w. succimer plus calcium and ascorbic acid by gavage. Seventy-two children aged 48-72 months were randomly assigned into combined treatment or nutritional intervention group. Lead levels in blood and bone were analyzed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Activities of aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD) in blood were determined by colorimetric method. Results of animal experiment showed that succimer used alone could reduce lead levels in blood and bone and reverse activities of ALAD in blood, however, a better therapeutic efficiency in mobilizing bone lead could be achieved by succimer used with calcium and ascorbic acid. Findings from the clinical study showed that reduction of blood lead levels (BLLs) between the end and initiation of therapy in the combined treatment group was significantly greater than that in the nutritional intervention group. Percentage of children with BLLs less than 10 mu g/dL at the end of therapy and the eighth week after therapy in the combined treatment group was significantly higher than that in the nutritional intervention group. In conclusion, combined use of succimer with calcium and ascorbic acid seemed to be a choice in the treatment of mildly lead poisoned children. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据