4.5 Article

Levels and distribution of tetrabromobisphenol A and hexabromocyclododecane in Taihu Lake, China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 32, 期 10, 页码 2249-2255

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etc.2318

关键词

Environmental analystical methodology; Contaminants of emerging concern; Environmental partitioning; Isomers

资金

  1. China's national basic research program, Water Environmental Quality Evolution and Water Quality Criteria in Lakes [2008CB418201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The occurrence and distribution characteristics of tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) and hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) in water and sediments from Taihu Lake, China, were investigated. The analytes were quantified by reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. The TBBPA levels in water ranged from below the limit of detection (LOD) to 1.12ng/L, whereas levels in sediments were between 0.056ng/g dry weight and 2.15ng/g dry weight. Regarding HBCD, concentrations were from below the LOD to 0.37ng/L for water samples and from 0.046ng/g dry weight to 2.56ng/g dry weight for sediments. No correlation was found between sediment total organic carbon content and TBBPA/HBCDs, while significant positive correlations (r(2)=0.63, p<0.005) were observed between TBBPA concentrations and HBCD concentrations in sediments. The highest TBBPA (2.15ng/g dry wt) and total HBCD concentration (2.56ng/g dry wt) was found at sampling site 1 (S1), while total HBCD levels fell dramatically with increasing distance from S1, suggesting that the estuary inputs around Taihu Lake were important sources of TBBPA and HBCDs. Compared with the pollution levels in the other regions of the world, the concentrations of TBBPA and HBCDs in Taihu Lake were at a moderate or low level. Further study on the sources of TBBPA and HBCDs is required for both assessment of their potential risks and better pollution management in Taihu Lake. Environ Toxicol Chem 2013;32:2249-2255. (c) 2013 SETAC

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据