4.5 Article

Evaluation of critical body residue data for acute narcosis in aquatic organisms

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 32, 期 10, 页码 2301-2314

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etc.2289

关键词

Narcosis; Body residue; Toxicity modifying factors; Biotransformation

资金

  1. European Chemical Industry Council [LRI ECO16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Environmental Residue Effects Database was evaluated to identify critical body residues of organic chemicals causing acute baseline neutral narcosis in aquatic organisms. Over 15 000 records for >400 chemicals were evaluated. Mean molar critical body residues in the final data set of 161 records for 29 chemicals were within published ranges but varied within and among chemicals and species (approximate to 3 orders of magnitude), and lipid normalization did not consistently decrease variability. All 29 chemicals can act as baseline neutral narcotics, but chemicals and/or their metabolites may also act by nonnarcotic modes of action. Specifically, nonnarcotic toxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and/or their biotransformation derivatives may be a significant source of variability. Complete testing of the narcosis-critical body residue hypothesis was confounded by data gaps for key toxicity modifying factors such as metabolite formation/toxicity, lipid content/composition, other modes of toxic action, and lack of steady-state status. Such problems impede determination of the precise, accurate toxicity estimates necessary for sound toxicological comparisons. Thus, neither the data nor the chemicals in the final data set should be considered definitive. Changes to testing designs and methods are necessary to improve data collection and critical body residue interpretation for hazard and risk assessment. Each of the toxicity metrics discussedwet weight and lipid weight critical body residues, volume fraction in organism lipid, and chemical activityhas advantages, but all are subject to the same toxicity modifying factors. Environ Toxicol Chem 2013;32:2301-2314. (c) 2013 SETAC

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据