4.5 Article

Comparing predicted against measured steroid estrogen concentrations and the associated risk in two United Kingdom river catchments

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 892-898

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/etc.1756

关键词

Modeling; Steroid estrogens; Avon River; Erewash River; LF2000-WQX; Risk assessment

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010022, ceh010023] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Predicted concentrations of estrone, 17 beta-estradiol, and 17a-ethinylestradiol generated from a geographical information systems-based model (LF2000-WQX) have previously been used to assess the risk of causing intersex in male fish in the rivers of England and Wales, United Kingdom. Few measured data of sufficient quality and spatial extent have been available to verify this risk assessment. New measured data have been collected from sewage treatment plant effluents and the receiving waters upstream and downstream of these discharges from the Erewash River and the Avon River systems in England. The model results for these rivers were in good agreement with the measured values in terms of estradiol equivalents. Critically, the risk assessment based on the measured data gave a risk assessment nearly identical to that derived from the modeled results. For individual estrogens, 17a-ethinylestradiol was modeled best and estrone worst. Poor simulations reflected poor estimates of the effluent concentrations, which were more variable from day to day and between works of nominally similar type than is assumed in the model. In support of this, model results for the Erewash River, calculated using observed effluent concentrations, were in excellent agreement with the measured data. The model has proved to be adequate in predicting overall estrogenic potency, and therefore risk, along these rivers; however, improvements are possible, particularly in predicting STP removal efficiency and therefore effluent concentrations. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012;31:892898. (c) 2012 SETAC

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据