4.5 Article

BIOACCUMULATION DYNAMICS AND EXPOSURE ROUTES OF Cd AND Cu AMONG SPECIES OF AQUATIC MAYFLIES

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 30, 期 11, 页码 2532-2541

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/etc.663

关键词

Dietary exposure; Benthic grazers; Bioaccumulation; Cadmium; Copper

资金

  1. National Research Program
  2. U.S. Geological Survey

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Consumption of periphyton is a potentially important route of metal exposure to benthic invertebrate grazers. The present study examined the bioaccumulation kinetics of dissolved and dietary Cd and Cu in five species of mayflies (class Insecta). Artificial stream water and benthic diatoms were separately labeled with enriched stable metal isotopes to determine physiological rate constants used by a biokinetic bioaccumulation model. The model was employed to simulate the effects of metal partitioning between water and food, expressed as the bioconcentration factor (BCF), as well as ingestion rate (IR) and metal assimilation efficiency of food (AE), on the relative importance of water and food to metal bioaccumulation. For all test species, the contribution of dietary uptake of Cd and Cu increased with BCF. For a given BCF, the contribution of food to the body burden increased with k(uf), the metal uptake rate constant from food that combined variation in IR and AE. To explore the relative importance of water and diet exposure routes under field conditions, we used estimated site-specific aqueous free-ion concentrations to model Cd and Cu accumulation from aqueous exposure, exclusively. The predicted concentrations accounted for less than 5% of the observed concentrations, implying that most bioaccumulated metal was acquired from food. At least for the taxa considered in this study, we conclude that consumption of metal-contaminated periphyton can result in elevated metal body burdens and potentially increase the risk of metal toxicity. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011;30:2532-2541. (C) 2011 SETAC

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据