4.7 Article

Impact of Fe and Ag nanoparticles on seed germination and differences in bioavailability during exposure in aqueous suspension and soil

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 42-49

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/tox.20610

关键词

bioavailability; ecotoxicity; nanoparticles; silver; zero-valent iron

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential environmental toxicity of zero-valent iron nanoparticles (nZVI) and three types of nanosilver differing in average particle size from 1 to 20 nm was evaluated using seed germination tests with ryegrass, barley, and flax exposed to 05000 mg L-1 nZVI or 0100 mg L-1 Ag. For nZVI, germination tests were conducted both in water and in two contrasting soils to test the impact of assumed differences in bioavailability of nanoparticles. Inhibitory effects were observed in aqueous suspensions at 250 mg L-1 for nZVI and 10 mg L-1 for Ag. Reduction in shoot growth was a more sensitive endpoint than germination percentage. Complete inhibition of germination was observed at 10002000 mg L-1 for nZVI. For Ag, complete inhibition was not achieved. The presence of soil had a modest influence on toxicity, and inhibitory effects were observed at 300 mg nZVI L-1 water in soil (equivalent to 1000 mg nZVI kg-1 soil). Complete inhibition was observed at 750 and 1500 mg L-1 in sandy soil for flax and ryegrass, respectively, while for barley 13% germination still occurred at 1500 mg L-1. In clay soil, inhibition was less pronounced. Our results indicate that nZVI at low concentrations can be used without detrimental effects on plants and thus be suitable for combined remediation where plants are involved. Silver nanoparticles inhibited seed germination at lower concentrations, but showed no clear size-dependant effects, and never completely impeded germination. Thus, seed germination tests seem less suited for estimation of environmental impact of Ag. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol 2012.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据