4.7 Article

Stage-Dependent Toxicity of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic on the Embryonic Development of a South American Toad, Rhinella arenarum

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 373-381

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/tox.20564

关键词

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid; embryonic development; herbicide; amphibian embryo; teratogenesis; commercial agrochemical; stage-dependent toxicity

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET) [PIP2316, 5324]
  2. Universidad Nacional de San Martin [SA-08-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The acute and short term chronic toxicity of both the herbicide butyl ester of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and a commercial formulation (CF) were evaluated on Rhinella (= Bufo) arenarum embryos at different developmental stages. Adverse effects were analyzed by means of the isotoxicity curves for lethality, malformations, stage-dependent susceptibility, and ultrastructural features. For all experimental conditions, the CF was more toxic, up to 10 times, than the active ingredient, being the open mouth stage (S. 21) the most susceptible to the herbicide. For continuous treatment conditions, the early embryonic development was the most susceptible to 2,4-D and the LC50s for 96 and 168 h were 9.06 and 7.76 mg L(-1) respectively. In addition, both the active ingredient and the CF were highly teratogenic, resulting in reduced body size, delayed development, microcephaly, agenesis of gills, and abnormal cellular proliferation processes as the main adverse effects. According to US EPA, 2,4-D in agricultural scenarios may be up to three times higher than the NOEC values for teratogenic effects reported in this study. Therefore, they might represent a risk for amphibians. This study also points out the relevance of reporting the susceptibility of embryos at different developmental stages to both the active ingredient and the CF of agrochemicals in order to protect nontarget organisms. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol 26: 373-381, 2011.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据