4.4 Article

Enhanced phosphorus removal from sewage in mesocosm-scale constructed wetland using zeolite as medium and artificial aeration

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 35, 期 13, 页码 1639-1649

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2013.877984

关键词

phosphorus removal; natural zeolite; artificial aeration; constructed wetland; sewage treatment

资金

  1. CONICYT (Chile) [AT-24100052]
  2. Corfo Innova BioBio (Chile) [10CHS2 680F11]
  3. Red Doctoral REDOC.CTA at University of Concepcion [UCO1202]
  4. [CONICYT/FONDAP/15130015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphorus (P) contained in sewage maybe removed by mesocosm-scale constructed wetlands (MCW), although removal efficiency is only between 20% and 60%. P removal can be enhanced by increasing wetland adsorption capacity using special media, like natural zeolite, operating under aerobic conditions (oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) above+300mV). The objective of this study was to evaluate P removal in sewage treated by MCW with artificial aeration and natural zeolite as support medium for the plants. The study compared two parallel lines of MCW: gravel and zeolite. Each line consisted in two MCW in series, where the first MCW of each line has artificial aeration. Additionally, four aeration strategies were evaluated. During the operation, the following parameters were measured in each MCW: pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen and ORP. Phosphate () and chemical oxygen demand (COD), five-day biological oxygen demand (BOD5), total suspended solids (TSS) and ammonium. (NH (+)(4)-N ) were evaluated in influents and effluents. Plant growth (biomass) and proximate analysis for P content into Schoenoplectus californicus were also performed. The results showed that removal efficiency was 70% in the zeolite medium, presenting significant differences (p<.05) with the results obtained by the gravel medium. Additionally, aeration was found to have a significant effect (p<.05) only in the gravel medium with an increase in up to 30% for removal. Thus, S. californicus contributed to 10-20% of P removal efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据