4.4 Article

The identification of sediment sources in a small urban watershed in southern Brazil: An application of sediment fingerprinting

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 30, 期 11, 页码 1145-1153

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09593330903112154

关键词

sediment sources; urban hydrology; sediment chemistry; trace elements; fingerprinting

资金

  1. Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq)
  2. CAPES
  3. Research Support Foundation of Rio Grande do Sul (Fapergs)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil particles eroded from the land surface and transported into rivers by runoff are considered one of the main components of non-point source pollution in urban watersheds. These particles also serve as a vector for a wide variety of both organic and inorganic constituents. As a result, the identification of sediment sources in an urban watershed is necessary not only to understand erosion dynamics, but also to help implement more effective measures to control and/or remediate non-point source pollution. The present study employs sediment 'fingerprinting' to determine the main sediment sources in a small residential urban watershed (0.83 km2) on the outskirts of Porto Alegre in southern Brazil. Based on an evaluation spanning 12 rainfall events, the results show that paved and unpaved roads and the stream channel itself contribute, on average, 46%, 23%, and 31%, respectively, to the suspended sediment flux in the watershed. Furthermore, the source contributions varied both between events and over the course of a single event. This appears to imply that source contributions, at least to some extent, depend on local precipitation patterns. The results from this study indicate that the level of uncertainty in source ascription tends to decline with increasing numbers of tracers; hence, successful sediment fingerprinting and source ascription in complex hydrologic environments, such as urban watersheds, may require the use of a large number of chemical and/or physical tracers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据