4.5 Article

Dry granular flows: Rheological measurements of the μ(I)-rheology

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEOLOGY
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 1065-1080

出版社

JOURNAL RHEOLOGY AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1122/1.4922653

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Granular materials do not always flow homogeneously like fluids when submitted to external stress, but often form rigid regions that are separated by narrow shear bands where the material yields and flows. This shear localization impacts their apparent rheology, which makes it difficult to infer a constitutive behavior from conventional rheometric measurements. Moreover, they present a dilatant behavior, which makes their study in classical fixed-volume geometries difficult. These features led numerous groups to perform extensive studies with inclined plane flows, which were of crucial importance for the development and the validation of the mu(I)-rheology. Our aim is to develop a method to characterize granular materials with rheometrical tools. Using rheometry measurements in an annular shear cell, dense granular flows of 0.5 mm spherical and monodisperse beads are studied. A focus is placed on the comparison between the present results and the mu(I)-rheology. From steady state measurements of the torque and the gap under imposed shear rate gamma and normal force F-N, we define an inertial number I. We show that, at low I (small gamma and/or large F-N), the flow goes to a quasistatic limit, and the response in terms of dimensionless stress or internal friction coefficient-mu-and solid concentration-phi-profiles is independent of the inertial number. Upon increasing I (large gamma and/or small F-N), dilation occurs and phi decreases while mu increases. The observed variations are in good agreement with previous observations of the literature [Jop et al., Nature 441, 727-730 (2006) and Hatano, Phys. Rev. E 75, 060301 (R) (2007)]. These results show that the constitutive equations mu(I) and phi(I) of granular materials can bemeasured with a rheometer. (C) 2015 The Society of Rheology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据