4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

PAHs in sediment cores at main river estuaries of Chaohu Lake: implication for the change of local anthropogenic activities

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 1687-1696

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3141-z

关键词

Chaohu Lake; PAHs; Sediment core; Environmental risk assessment and historical record

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41390240, 41130206]
  2. National Project for Water Pollution Control [2012ZX07503-003-002]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2012HGBZ0207]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, 28 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were investigated in four sediment cores collected from the main river estuaries of Chaohu Lake, one of the severely polluted lakes in China. The results indicate that elevated concentrations of total PAHs (Sigma(28)PAH) were found in the samples from the estuary of Nanfei River (ENF), considering BaP-based total toxicity equivalent (TEQ-BaP) and toxic unit (TU) results; there are potential adverse environmental implications. The total organic carbon (TOC) played an important role on the accumulation of PAHs at ENF and the estuary of Tongyang River (ETY). The predominant PAHs are high molecular weight (HMW) homologous for all samples; as a result, industrial wastewater from a steel company is expectedly the key source of PAHs in ENF, while coke consumption would be the important source of PAHs at other three sampling sites. Vertical distribution of PAHs in the sediment cores could be explained by the local social and economic activities. Furthermore, a minor variation of PAH composition in the sediment core could be justified by the stable structure of energy consumption in the Anhui Province. These results justify the need for further enhancement of industrial wastewater treatment and development of renewable energies which are the key factors on the control of PAH pollution in China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据