4.7 Article

Understanding the formation of colloidal mercury in acidic wastewater with high concentration of chloride ions by electrocapillary curves

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 3866-3872

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-2379-1

关键词

Dropping mercury electrode; Electrocapillary curve; Acidic wastewater; Colloidal mercury; Model

资金

  1. China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [50925417]
  2. National Twelfth Five-Year Plan for Science & Technology Support [2012BAC12B03]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51304251]
  4. Postdoctoral Natural Science Foundation of China [2013 M542141]
  5. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Central South University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acidic wastewater with high concentration of chloride ions was generated from washing elemental mercury (Hg-0) existed in the roast flue gas by water. This process was simulated by mercury drops entering the electrolytes with its composition changed according to the characteristics of acidic wastewater. Electrocapillary curves of different electrolytes were determined by dropping mercury electrode to explore the formation mechanism of colloidal mercury in acidic wastewater. The changes of zeta (zeta) potentials were also obtained. The results indicate that chloride ions have a great impact on the formation of colloidal mercury. Thermodynamic calculation demonstrated that the main mercury species in acidic wastewater were HgCl2 (aq), HgCl3 (-), and HgCl4 (2-). Moreover, the model of colloidal mercury structure in acidic wastewater was established. Based on the changes of Gibbs free energy for ions passing through stern layer and metallic bond theory, it can be inferred that HgCl4 (2-) was preferentially over-adsorbed on the mercury interface by the weak pi chemical bond, and then positive charge ions such as heavy metal ions and H+ were adsorbed due to the electrostatic force; thus, the colloidal mercury was formed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据