4.7 Article

Characteristics of an aerobic denitrifier that utilizes ammonium and nitrate simultaneously under the oligotrophic niche

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 3185-3191

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-0822-3

关键词

Aerobic denitrifier; Heterotrophic nitrification; Pseudomonas mendocina 3-7; Oligotrophic niche

资金

  1. National Key Technologies Research and Development Program of China [2006BAJ08B01/2012BAJ25B07]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51078327/51008269]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An aerobic denitrifier was isolated from the Hua-Jia-Chi pond in China and identified as Pseudomonas mendocina 3-7 (Genbank No. HQ285879). This isolated strain could express periplasmic nitrate reductase which is essential for aerobic denitrification occurred when the dissolved oxygen (DO) level maintains at 3-10 mg L-1. To determine whether the ability of isolated strain is exhibited in the bioremediation of polluted drinking source water, the heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification characteristics of P. mendocina 3-7 under different cultural conditions such as oxygen level, nitrate and organic concentrations were studied from the nitrogenous balance in the paper. By measuring the nitrogen balance in all experiments under different culture conditions, the removal of total organic carbon and ammonium was positively correlated with total nitrogen removal, especially under high substrate level. With substrate concentration decreasing, ammonium and nitrate removal occurred separately, and ammonium was completely utilized first under low substrate concentration. Compared to that under high substrate level, the specific growth rate of P. mendocina 3-7 was not low under the low substrate level and the pollutant removal efficiencies remained high, which implies the stronger nitrogen removal and acclimatization capacities of the strain in oligotrophic niches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据