4.7 Article

Bioremediation of chromium by novel strains Enterobacter aerogenes T2 and Acinetobacter sp PD 12 S2

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 19, 期 5, 页码 1809-1817

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-011-0702-2

关键词

Chromium-resistant bacteria; Enterobacter aerogenes; Acinetobacter sp PD 12; Bioremediation,TEM, AFM

资金

  1. University Grants Commission (UGC), India
  2. UGC
  3. Sensor-Hub

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose This study had an objective to identify the most potent chromium-resistant bacteria isolated from tannery effluent and apply them for bioremediation of chromium in tannery effluents. Methods Two such strains (previously characterized and identified by us)-Enterobacter aerogenes (NCBI GenBank USA Accession no. GU265554) and Acinetobacter sp. PD 12 (NCBI GenBank USA Accession no. GU084179)-showed powerful chromium resistivity and bioremediation capabilities among many stains isolated from tannery waste. Parameters such as pH, concentration of hexavalent chromium or Cr (VI), and inoculum volume were varied to observe optimum bioconversion and bioaccumulation of Cr (VI) when the said strains were grown in M9 minimal salt media. E. aerogenes was used to remediate chromium from tannery effluents in a laboratory level experiment. Results Observation by Scanning Electron Microscope and chromium peak in Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopic microanalysis revealed that E. aerogenes helped remediate a moderate amount of Cr (VI) (8-16 mg L-1) over a wide range of pH values at 35-37 degrees C (within 26.05 h). High inoculum percentage of Acinetobacter sp. PD 12 also enabled bioremediation of 8-16 mg L-1 of Cr (VI) over a wide range of temperature (25-37 degrees C), mainly at pH 7 (within 63.28 h). The experiment with real tannery effluent gave very encouraging results. Conclusion The strain E. aerogenes can be used in bioremediation of Cr (VI) since it could work in actual environmental conditions with extraordinarily high capacity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据