4.8 Article

Production of Nitrous Oxide From Anaerobic Digester Centrate and Its Use as a Co-oxidant of Biogas to Enhance Energy Recovery

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 10, 页码 5612-5619

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es501009j

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center Reinventing the Nation's Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt) [EEC-1028968]
  2. Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford University
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation Partnership for Innovation Research Technology Translation Program [109802]
  4. Delta Diablo Sanitation District
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh [1312359] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coupled Aerobic-anoxic Nitrous Decomposition Operation (CANDO) is a new process for wastewater treatment that removes nitrogen from wastewater and recovers energy from the nitrogen in three steps: (1) NH4+ oxidation to NO2-; (2) NO2- reduction to N2O gas; and (3) N2O conversion to N-2 with energy production. In this work, we optimize Steps 1 and 2 for anaerobic digester centrate, and we evaluate Step 3 for a full-scale biogas-fed internal combustion engine. Using a continuous stirred reactor coupled to a bench-scale sequencing batch reactor, we observed sustained partial oxidation of NH4+ to NO2- and sustained (3 months) partial reduction of NO2- to N2O (75-80% conversion, mass basis), with >95% nitrogen removal (Step 2). Alternating pulses of acetate and NO2- selected for Comamonas (38%), Ciceribacter (16%), and Clostridium (11%). Some species stored polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and coupled oxidation of PHB to reduction of NO2- to N2O. Some species also stored phosphorus as polyphosphate granules. Injections of N2O into a biogas-fed engine at flow rates simulating a full-scale system increased power output by 5.7-7.3%. The results underscore the need for more detailed assessment of bioreactor community ecology and justify pilot- and full-scale testing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据