4.8 Article

Redox Properties of Plant Biomass-Derived Black Carbon (Biochar)

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 10, 页码 5601-5611

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es500906d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021_135515]
  2. Institute of Soil Landscape Research, Leibniz-Center for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Muncheberg, Germany
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_135515] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soils and sediments worldwide contain appreciable amounts of thermally altered organic matter (chars). Chars contain electroactive quinoid functional groups and polycondensed aromatic sheets that were recently shown to be of biogeochemical and envirotechnical relevance. However, so far no systematic investigation of the redox properties of chars formed under different pyrolysis conditions has been performed. Here, using mediated electrochemical analysis, we show that chars made from different feedstock and over a range of pyrolysis conditions are redox-active and reversibly accept and donate up to 2 mmol electrons per gram of char. The analysis of two thermosequences revealed that chars produced at intermediate to high heat treatment temperatures (HTTs) (400-700 degrees C) show the highest capacities to accept and donate electrons. Combined electrochemical, elemental, and spectroscopic analyses of the thermosequence chars provide evidence that the pool of redox-active moieties is dominated by electron-donating, phenolic moieties in the low-HTT chars, by newly formed electron accepting quinone moieties in intermediate-HTT chars, and by electron accepting quinones and possibly condensed aromatics in the high-HTT chars. We propose to consider chars in environmental engineering applications that require controlled electron transfer reactions. Electroactive char components may also contribute to the redox properties of traditionally defined humic substances.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据