4.8 Article

Conceptual Model and Experimental Framework to Determine the Contributions of Direct and Indirect Photoreactions to the Solar Disinfection of MS2, phiX174, and Adenovirus

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 334-342

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es504764u

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPFL
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [200020_131918]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200020_131918] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sunlight inactivates waterborne viruses via direct (absorption of sunlight by the virus) and indirect processes (adsorption of sunlight by external chromophores, which subsequently generate reactive species). While the mechanisms underlying these processes are understood, their relative importance remains unclear. This study establishes an experimental framework to determine the kinetic parameters associated with a virus' susceptibility to solar disinfection and proposes a model to estimate disinfection rates and to apportion the contributions of different inactivation processes. Quantum yields of direct inactivation were determined for three viruses (MS2, phiX174, and adenovirus), and second-order rate constants associated with indirect inactivation by four reactive species (O-1(2), OH center dot, CO3 center dot-, and triplet states) were established. PhiX174 exhibited the greatest quantum yield (1.4 x 10(-2)), indicating that it is more susceptible to direct inactivation than MS2 (2.9 x 10(-3)) or adenovirus (2.5 x 10(-4)). Second-order rate constants ranged from 1.7 x 10(7) to 7.0 x 10(9) M-1 s(-1) and followed the sequence MS2 > adenovirus > phiX174. A predictive model based on these parameters accurately estimated solar disinfection of MS2 and phiX174 in a natural water sample and approximated that of adenovirus within a factor of 6. Inactivation mostly occurred by direct processes, though indirect inactivation by O-1(2) also contributed to the disinfection of MS2 and adenovirus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据