4.8 Article

Shift of the Reactive Species in the Sb SnO2-Electrocatalyzed Inactivation of E-coli and Degradation of Phenol: Effects of Nickel Doping and Electrolytes

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 2877-2884

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es404688z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Programs [2012R1A2A2A01004517, 2011-0021148]
  2. Framework of International Cooperation Program [2013K2A1A2052901]
  3. Korea Center for Artificial Photosynthesis (KCAP) through the National Research Foundation (NRF), Korea [2012M1A2A2671779]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electrocatalytic behavior and anodic performance of Sb-SnO2 and nickel-doped Sb-SnO2 (Ni-Sb-SnO2) in sodium sulfate and sodium chloride electrolytes were compared. Nickel-doping increased the service lifetime by a factor of 9 and decreased the charge transfer resistance of the Sb-SnO2 electrodes by 65%. More importantly, Ni doping improved the electrocatalytic performance of Sb-SnO2 for the remediation of aqueous phenol and the inactivation of E. coli by a factor of more than 600% and similar to 20%, respectively. In the sulfate electrolyte, the primary reactive oxygen species (ROS) identified were OH radicals (Faradaic efficiency eta = 2.4%) with trace levels of ozone and hydrogen peroxide (eta < 0.01%) at Sb-SnO2. In contrast, the primary ROS at Ni-Sb-SnO2 was ozone (eta = 9.3%) followed by OH radicals (eta = 3.7%). In the chloride electrolyte, the production of hypochlorite (OCl-) was higher (7 eta = 0.73%) than that of ozone (eta = 0.13%) at Sb-SnO2, whereas the level of ozone (eta = 13.6%) was much higher than that of hypochlorite (eta = 0.24%) at Ni-Sb-SnO2. Based on the shift of the reactive species, the primary effect of Ni doping is to catalyze the six-electron oxidation of water to ozone and inhibit the competing one or two-electron oxidation of water (generation of OH radicals, hydrogen peroxides, and hypochlorites). A range of electrochemical and surface analyses were performed, and a detailed mechanism was proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据