4.8 Article

2013 Southeast Asian Smoke Haze: Fractionation of Particulate-Bound Elements and Associated Health Risk

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 8, 页码 4327-4335

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es405533d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National University of Singapore [R-302-000-082-133]
  2. Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology's CENSAM research programme [R-302-000-076-592]
  3. CENSAM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recurring biomass burning-induced smoke haze is a serious regional air pollution problem in Southeast Asia (SEA). The June 2013 haze episode was one of the worst air pollution events in SEA. Size segregated particulate samples (2.5-1.0 mu m; 1.0-0.5 mu m; 0.5 0.2 mu m; and <0.2 mu m) were collected during the June 2013 haze episode. PM2.5 concentrations were elevated (up to 329 mu g/m(3)) during the haze episode, compared to those during the nonhaze period (11-21 mu g/m(3)). Chemical fractionation of particulate-bound trace elements (B, Ca, K, Fe, Al, Ni, Zn, Mg, Se, Cu, Cr, As, Mn, Pb, Co, and Cd) was done using sequential extraction procedures. There was a 10-fold increase in the concentration of K, an inorganic tracer of biomass burning. A major fraction (>60%) of the elements was present in oxidizable and residual fractions while the bioavailable (exchangeable) fraction accounted for up to 20% for most of the elements except K and Mn. Deposition of inhaled potentially toxic trace elements in various regions of the human respiratory system was estimated using a Multiple-Path Particle Dosimetry model. The particle depositions in the respiratory system tend to be more severe-during hazy days than those during nonhazy days. A prolonged exposure to finer particles can thus cause adverse health outcomes during hazy days. Health risk estimates revealed that the excessive lifetime carcinogenic risk to individuals exposed to biomass burning-impacted aerosols (18 +/- 1 x 10(-6)) increased significantly (P < 0.05) compared to those who exposed to urban air (12 +/- 2 x 10(-6)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据