4.8 Article

Nitrate Shaped the Selenate-Reducing Microbial Community in a Hydrogen-Based Biofilm Reactor

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 6, 页码 3395-3402

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es4053939

关键词

-

资金

  1. Zhejiang University Cross-Funding [JCZZ-2013033]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21107091, 21377109]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2013AA06A205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To study the effect of nitrate (NO3-) on selenate (SeO42-) reduction, we tested a H-2-based biofilm with a range of influent NO3- loadings. When SeO42- was the only electron acceptor (stage 1), 40% of the influent SeO42- was reduced to insoluble elemental selenium (Se). SeO42- reduction was dramatically inhibited when NO3- was added at a surface loading larger than 1.14 g of N m(-2) day(-1), when H-2 delivery became limiting and only 80% of the input NO3- was reduced (stage 2). In stage 3, when NO3- was again removed from the influent, SeO42- reduction was re-established and increased to 60% conversion to Se-0. SeO42- reduction remained stable at 60% in stages 4 and 5, when the NO3- surface loading was re-introduced at <= 50.53 g of N m(-2) day(-1), allowing for complete NO3- reduction. The selenate-reducing microbial community was significantly reshaped by the high NO3- surface loading in stage 2, and it remained stable through stages 3-5. In particular, the abundance of alpha-Proteobacteria decreased from 30% in stage 1 to less than 10% of total bacteria in stage 2. beta-Proteobacteria, which represented about 55% of total bacteria in the biofilm in stage 1, increased to more than 90% of phylotypes in stage 2. Hydrogenophaga, an autotrophic denitrifier, was positively correlated with NO3- flux. Thus, introducing a NO3- loading high enough to cause H-2 limitation and suppress SeO42- reduction had a long-lasting effect on the microbial community structure, which was confirmed by principal coordinate analysis, although SeO42- reduction remained intact.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据