4.8 Article

Ocean Acidification Increases Copper Toxicity to the Early Life History Stages of the Polychaete Arenicola marina in Artificial Seawater

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 16, 页码 9745-9753

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es502739m

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  2. UK-OARP NERC consortium [NE/H017496/1]
  3. NERC UK [NE/G014728/1]
  4. NERC [NE/G014728/1, NE/H017496/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [1200208, NE/H017496/1, NE/G014728/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The speciation and therefore bioavailability of the common pollutant copper is predicted to increase within the pH range anticipated under near-future ocean acidification (OA), hence the potential exists for copper toxicity to marine organisms to also increase. We investigated the impact of OA (seawater pH values of 7.77 (pCO(2) 1400 mu atm) and 7.47 (pCO(2) 3000 mu atm)) upon copper toxicity responses in early life history stages of the polychaete Arenicola marina and found both synergistic and additive toxicity effects of combined exposures depending on life history stage. The toxicity of copper on sperm DNA damage and early larval survivorship was synergistically increased under OA conditions. Larval survival was reduced by 24% when exposed to both OA and copper combined compared to single OA or copper exposures. Sperm motility was negatively affected by both OA and copper singularly with additive toxicity effects of the two stressors when combined. Fertilization success was also negatively affected by both OA and copper individually, but no additive effects when exposed as combined stressors were present for this stage. These findings add to the growing body of evidence that OA will act to increase the toxicity of copper to marine organisms, which has clear implications for coastal benthic ecosystems suffering chronic metal pollution as pCO(2) levels rise and drive a reduction in seawater pH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据