4.8 Article

On the Role of Particle Inorganic Mixing State in the Reactive Uptake of N2O5 to Ambient Aerosol Particles

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 3, 页码 1618-1627

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es4042622

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Science (Office of Biological and Environmental Research), U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0006431]
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE1038028]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0006431] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rates of heterogeneous reactions of trace gases with aerosol particles are complex functions of particle chemical composition, morphology, and phase state. Currently, the majority of model parametrizations of heterogeneous reaction kinetics focus on the population average of aerosol particle mass, assuming that individual particles have the same chemical composition as the average state. Here we assess the impact of particle mixing state on heterogeneous reaction kinetics using the N2O5 reactive uptake coefficient, gamma(N2O5), and dependence on the particulate chloride-to-nitrate ratio (nCl(-)/nNO(3)(-)). We describe the first simultaneous ambient observations of single particle chemical composition and in situ determinations of gamma(N2O5). When accounting for particulate (nCl(-)/nNO(3)(-)) mixing state, model parametrizations of gamma(N2O5) continue to overpredict gamma(N2O5) by more than a factor of 2 in polluted coastal regions, suggesting that chemical composition and physical phase state of particulate organics likely control gamma(N2O5) in these air masses. In contrast, direct measurement of gamma(N2O5) in air masses of marine origin are well captured by model parametrizations and reveal limited suppression of gamma(N2O5), indicating that the organic mass fraction of fresh sea spray aerosol at this location does not suppress gamma(N2O5). We provide an observation-based framework for assessing the impact of particle mixing state on gas-particle interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据