4.8 Article

Highly Elevated Atmospheric Levels of Volatile Organic Compounds in the Uintah Basin, Utah

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 9, 页码 4707-4715

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es405046r

关键词

-

资金

  1. State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality
  2. Directorate For Geosciences
  3. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1331606] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oil and natural gas production in the Western United States has grown rapidly in recent years, and with this industrial expansion, growing environmental concerns have arisen regarding impacts on water supplies and air quality. Recent studies have revealed highly enhanced atmospheric levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from primary emissions in regions of heavy oil and gas development and associated rapid photochemical production of ozone during winter. Here, we present surface and vertical profile observations of VOC from the Uintah Basin Winter Ozone Studies conducted in January-February of 2012 and 2013. These measurements identify highly elevated levels of atmospheric alkane hydrocarbons with enhanced rates of C-2-O-5 nonmethane hydrocarbon (NMHC) mean mole fractions during temperature inversion events in 2013 at 200-300 times above the regional and seasonal background. Elevated atmospheric NMHC mole fractions coincided with build-up of ambient 1-h ozone to levels exceeding 150 ppbv (parts per billion by volume). The total annual mass flux of C-2-C-7 VOC was estimated at 194 +/- 56 x 106 kg yr(-1), equivalent to the annual VOC emissions of a fleet of similar to 100 million automobiles. Total annual fugitive emission of the aromatic compounds benzene and toluene, considered air toxics, were estimated at 1.6 +/- 0.4 x 10(6) and 2.0 +/- 0.5 x 10(6) kg yr(-1), respectively. These observations reveal a strong causal link between oil and gas emissions, accumulation of air toxics, and significant production of ozone in the atmospheric surface layer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据