4.8 Article

Isotopic Compositions of 236U and Pu Isotopes in Black Substances Collected from Roadsides in Fukushima Prefecture: Fallout from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 7, 页码 3691-3697

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es405294s

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan [24110008]
  2. distribution mapping project
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25550013, 23710008, 24110001, 26257501, 24110008, 25305001, 22224011] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Black-colored road dusts were collected in high-radiation areas in Fukushima Prefecture. Measurement of U-236 and Pu isotopes and Cs-134,Cs-137 in samples was performed to confirm whether refractory elements, such as U and Pu, from the fuel core were discharged and to ascertain the extent of fractionation between volatile and refractory elements. The concentrations of Cs-134,Cs-137 in all samples were exceptionally high, ranging from 0.43 to 17.7 MBq/kg,, respectively. Pu239+240 was detected at low levels, ranging from 0.15 to 1.14 Bq/kg, and with high Pu-238/Pu239+240 activity ratios of 1.64-2.64. U-236 was successfully determined in the range of (0.28 to 6.74) X 10(-4) Bq/kg. The observed activity ratios for U-236/Pu239+240 were in reasonable agreement with those calculated for the fuel core inventories, indicating that trace amounts of U from the fuel cores were released together with Pu isotopes but without large fractionation. The quantities of U and Pu239+240 emitted to the atmosphere were estimated as 3.9 X 10(6) Bq (150 g) and 2.3 x 10(9) Bq (580 mg), respectively. With regard to U, this is the first report to give a quantitative estimation of the amount discharged. Appreciable fractionation between volatile and refractory radionuclides associated with the dispersal/deposition processes with distance from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant was found.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据