4.8 Article

Comparison of Particle Mass and Solid Particle Number (SPN) Emissions from a Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle under On-Road Driving Conditions and a Standard Testing Cycle

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 3, 页码 1779-1786

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es403578b

关键词

-

资金

  1. CARB [08-302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is important to understand the differences between emissions from standard laboratory testing cycles and those from actual on-road driving conditions, especially for solid particle number (SPN) emissions now being regulated in Europe. This study compared particle mass and SPN emissions from a heavy-duty diesel vehicle operating over the urban dynamometer driving schedule (UDDS) and actual on-road driving conditions. Particle mass emissions were calculated using the integrated particle size distribution (IPSD) method and called M-IPSD. The M-IPSD, emissions for the UDDS and on-road tests were more than 6 times lower than the U.S. 2007 heavy-duty particulate matter (PM) mass standard. The M-IPSD emissions for the UDDS fell between those for the on-road uphill and downhill driving. SPN and M-IPSD measurements were dominated by nucleation particles for the UDDS and uphill driving and by accumulation mode particles for cruise and downhill driving. The SPN emissions were similar to 3 times lower than the Euro 6 heavy-duty SPN limit for the UDDS and downhill driving and similar to 4-5 times higher than the Euro 6 SPN limit for the more aggressive uphill driving; however, it is likely that most of the solid particles measured under these conditions were associated with a combination release of stored sulfates and enhanced sulfate formation associated with high exhaust temperatures, leading to growth of volatile particles into the solid particle counting range above 23 nm. Except for these conditions, a linear relationship was found between SPN and accumulation mode M-IPSD. The coefficient of variation (Coy) of SPN emissions of particles >23 nm ranged from 8 to 26% for the UDDS and on-road tests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据