4.8 Article

Chemometrics-Assisted Effect-Directed Analysis of Crude and Refined Oil Using Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 3074-3083

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es404859m

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish National Council of Research (CSIC)
  2. European Social Fund (ESF)
  3. MICINN
  4. Research Council of Norway within the framework of the EU ERA-Net Initiative [CTM2008-02718-E/MAR, CTM2008-02721-E/MAR, ERAC-CT2005-016165]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An effect-directed analysis (EDA) of fresh and artificially weathered (evaporated, photooxidized) samples of North Sea crude oil and residual heavy fuel oil is presented. Aliphatic, aromatic, and polar oil fractions were tested for the presence of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonist and androgen receptor (AR) antagonist, demonstrating for the first time the AR antagonist effects in the aromatic and, to a lesser extent, polar fractions. An extension of the typical EDA strategy to include an N-way partial least-squares (N-PLS) model capable of relating the comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC X GC-TOFMS) data set to the bioassay data obtained from normal-phase LC fractions is proposed. The predicted AhR binding effects in the fresh and artificially weathered aromatic oil fractions facilitated the identification of alkyl-substituted three- and four-ring aromatic systems in the active fractions through the weighting of their contributions to the observed effects. A N-PLS chemometric model is demonstrated as a potentially useful strategy for future EDA studies that can streamline the compound identification process and provide additional reduction of samples' complexity. The AhR binding effects of the suspected compounds predicted by N-PLS and identified by GC X GC-TOFMS were confirmed using quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) estimates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据