4.8 Article

Experimental Observation of Permeability Changes In Dolomite at CO2 Sequestration Conditions

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 2445-2452

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es4036946

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy (DOE) Geothermal Technologies Program [EE0002764]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CHE-1230691]
  3. Institute on the Environment (IonE) at the University of Minnesota (UMN) through its Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment (IREE)
  4. George and Orpha Gibson Foundation
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [1230691] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Injection of cool CO2 into geothermally warm carbonate reservoirs for storage or geothermal energy production may lower near-well temperature and lead to mass transfer along flow paths leading away from the well. To investigate this process, a dolomite core was subjected to a 650 h, high pressure, CO2 saturated, flow-through experiment. Permeability increased from 10(-15.9) to 10(-15.2) m(2) over the initial 216 h at 21 degrees C, decreased to 10(-16.2) m(2) over 289 h at 50 degrees C, largely due to thermally driven CO2 exsolution, and reached a final value of 10(-16.4) m(2) after 145 h at 100 degrees C due to continued exsolution and the onset of dolomite precipitation. Theoretical calculations show that CO2 exsolution results in a maximum pore space CO2 saturation of 0.5, and steady state relative permeabilities of CO2 and water on the order of 0.0065 and 0.1, respectively. Post-experiment imagery reveals matrix dissolution at low temperatures, and subsequent filling-in of flow passages at elevated temperature. Geochemical calculations indicate that reservoir fluids subjected to a thermal gradient may exsolve and precipitate up to 200 cm(3) CO2 and 1.5 cm(3) dolomite per kg of water, respectively, resulting in substantial porosity and permeability redistribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据