4.8 Article

Mechanism of p-Substituted Phenol Oxidation at a Ti4O7 Reactive Electrochemical Membrane

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 10, 页码 5857-5867

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es5010472

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-1159764]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1356031] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research investigated the removal mechanisms of p-nitrophenol, p-methoxyphenol, and p-benzoquinone at a porous Ti4O7 reactive electrochemical membrane (REM) under anodic polarization. Cross-flow filtration experiments and density functional theory (DFT) calculations indicated that p:benzoquinone removal was primarily due to reaction with electrochemically formed OH center dot, while the dominant removal mechanism of p-nitrophenol and p-methoxyphenol was a function of the anodic potential. At low anodic potentials (1.7-1.8 V/SHE), p-nitrophenol and p-methoxyphenol were removed primarily by an electrochemical adsorption/polymerization mechanism on the REM. Increasing anodic potentials (1.9-3.2 V/SHE) resulted in the electroassisted adsorption mechanism contributing far less to p-methoxyphenol removal compared to p-nitrophenol. DFT calculations indicated that an increase in anodic potential resulted in a shift in p-methoxyphenol removal from a 1e(-) direct electron transfer (DET) reaction that resulted in radical formation and significant adsorption/polymerization, to a 2e(-) DET reaction that formed nonadsorbing products (i.e., p-benzoquinone). However, the anodic potentials were too low for the 2e(-) DET reaction to be thermodynamically favorable for p-nitrophenol. The decreased COD adsorption for p-nitrophenol at higher anodic potentials was attributed to reaction of soluble/adsorbed organics with OH center dot. These results provide the first mechanistic explanation for p-substituted phenolic compound removal during advanced electrochemical oxidation processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据