4.8 Article

Release of Quantum Dot Nanoparticles in Porous Media: Role of Cation Exchange and Aging Time

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 47, 期 20, 页码 11528-11536

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es402075f

关键词

-

资金

  1. joint BER-EPA-NSF Nanoparticulate Research Program of the Office of Biological and Environmental Research, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the fate and transport of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in subsurface environments is required for developing the best strategy for waste management and disposal of these materials. In this study, the deposition and release of quantum dot (QD) nanoparticles were studied in saturated sand columns. The QDs were first deposited in columns using 100 mM NaCl or 2 mM CaCl2 solutions. Deposited QDs were then contacted with deionized (DI) water and/or varying Na+ concentrations to induce release. QDs deposited in 100 mM Na+ were easily reversible when the column was rinsed with DI water. Conversely, QDs deposited in the presence of Ca2+ exhibited resistance to release with DI water. However, significant release occurred when the columns were flushed with NaCl solutions. This release behavior was explained by cation exchange (Ca2+ in exchange sites were replaced by Na+) which resulted in the breakdown of calcium bridging. We also studied the effect of aging time on the QD release. As the aging time increased, smaller amounts of QDs were released following cation exchange. However, deposited QDs were subsequently released when the column was flushed with DI water. The release behavior was modeled using a single first-order kinetic release process and changes in the maximum solid phase concentration of deposited QDs with transition in solution chemistry. The results of this study demonstrate that the presence of carboxyl groups on ENPs and divalent ions in the solution plays a key role in controlling ENP mobility in the subsurface environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据