4.8 Article

Enhanced Removal of Fluoride by Polystyrene Anion Exchanger Supported Hydrous Zirconium Oxide Nanoparticles

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 47, 期 16, 页码 9347-9354

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es401710q

关键词

-

资金

  1. Jiangsu NSF [BK2012017]
  2. NSFC [21177059]
  3. Ministry of Education of China [20120091130005]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of China [NCET10-0490]
  5. Changjiang Scholars Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we fabricated a novel nanocomposite HZO-201, an encapsulated nanosized hydrous zirconium oxide (HZO) within a commercial porous polystyrene anion exchanger D201, for highly efficient defluoridation of water. HZO-201 exhibited much higher preference than activated alumina and D201 toward fluoride removal when competing anions (chloride, sulfate, nitrate, and bicarbonate) coexisted at relatively high levels. Fixed column adsorption indicated that the effective treatable volume of water with HZO-201 was about 7-14 times as much as with D201 irrespective of whether synthetic solution or groundwater was the feeding solution. In addition, HZO-201 could treat >3000 BV of the acidic effluent (around 3.5 mg F-/L) per run at pH 3.5, compared to only similar to 4 BV with D201. The exhausted HZO-201 could be regenerated by NaOH solution for repeated use without any significant capacity loss. Such attractive performance of HZO-201 resulted from its specific hybrid structure, that is, the host anion exchanger D201 favors the preconcentration of fluoride ions inside the polymer based on the Donnan principle, and the encapsulated nanosized HZO exhibits preferable sequestration of fluoride through specific interaction, as further demonstrated by XPS spectra. The influence of solution pH, competitive anions, and contact time was also examined. The results suggested that HZO-201 has a great potential in efficient defluoridation of groundwater and acidic mine drainage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据