4.8 Article

Sulfidation of Silver Nanoparticles: Natural Antidote to Their Toxicity

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 47, 期 23, 页码 13440-13448

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es403527n

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  2. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under NSF [EF-0830093]
  3. Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology (CEINT)
  4. EPA's Science to Achieve Results (STAR) program, Transatlantic Initiative for Nanotechnology and the Environment (TINE) [RD834574]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanomaterials are highly dynamic in biological and environmental media. A critical need for advancing environmental health and safety research for nanomaterials is to identify physical and chemical transformations that affect the nanomaterial properties and their toxicity. Silver nanoparticles, one of the most toxic and well-studied nanomaterials, readily react with sulfide to form Ag(0)/Ag2S core-shell particles. Here, we show that sulfidation decreased silver nanoparticle toxicity to four diverse types of aquatic and terrestrial eukaryotic organisms (Danio rerio (zebrafish), Fundulus heteroclitus (killifish), Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode worm), and the aquatic plant Lemna minuta (least duckweed)). Toxicity reduction, which was dramatic in killifish and duckweed even for low extents of sulfidation (about 2 mol % S), is primarily associated with a decrease in Ag+ concentration after sulfidation due to the lower solubility of Ag2S relative to elemental Ag (Ag-0). These results suggest that even partial sulfidation of AgNP will decrease the toxicity of AgNPs relative to their pristine counterparts. We also show that, for a given organism, the presence of chloride in the exposure media strongly affects the toxicity results by affecting Ag speciation. These results highlight the need to consider environmental transformations of NPs in assessing their toxicity to accurately portray their potential environmental risks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据