4.8 Article

Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles Modify the Antioxidative Stress Enzyme Activities and Macromolecule Composition in Rice Seedlings

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 47, 期 24, 页码 14110-14118

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es4033887

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. Environmental Protection Agency [DBI-0830117]
  3. USDA [2011-38422-30835]
  4. NSF [CHE-0840525]
  5. Academy of Applied Science/U.S. Army Research Office, Research and Engineering Apprenticeship program (REAP) at UTEP [W11NF-10-2-0076, 13-7]
  6. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  7. Division Of Human Resource Development [1139929] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cerium oxide nanoparticles (nCeO(2)) have been shown to have significant interactions in plants; however, there are limited reports on their impacts in rice (Oryza sativa). Given the widespread environmental dispersal of nCeO(2), it is paramount to understand its biochemical and molecular impacts on a globally important agricultural crop, such as rice. This study was carried out to determine the impact of nCeO(2) on the oxidative stress, membrane damage, antioxidant enzymes' activities, and macromolecular changes in the roots of rice seedlings. Rice seeds (medium amylose) were grown for 10 days in nCeO(2) suspensions (0-500 mg L-1). Results showed that Ce in root seedlings increased as the external nCeO(2) increased without visible signs of toxicity. Relative to the control, the 62.5 mg nCeO(2) L-1 reduced the H2O2 generation in the roots by 75%. At 125 mg nCeO(2) L-1, the roots showed enhanced lipid peroxidation and electrolyte leakage, while at 500 mg L-1, the nCeO(2) increased the H2O2 generation in roots and reduced the fatty acid content. The lignin content decreased by 20% at 500 mg nCeO(2) L-1, despite the parallel increase in H2O2 content and peroxidase activities. Synchrotron mu-XRF confirmed the presence of Ce in the vascular tissues of the roots.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据