4.8 Article

Depassivation of Aged Fe0 by Inorganic Salts: Implications to Contaminant Degradation in Seawater

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 47, 期 13, 页码 7350-7356

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es400362w

关键词

-

资金

  1. UNSW [RG114816]
  2. ARC [LP100100852]
  3. Australian Research Council [LP100100852] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, aged (iron oxide coated) Fe-0 was applied to the degradation of trichloroethylene (TCE) in seawater. It was found that while the aged Fe-0 was inactive with regard to TCE degradation in Milli-Qwater, more than 95% of the TCE present was degraded in real and synthetic seawater solutions after exposure to aged Fe-0 for 21 days. Results with individual salts from the synthetic seawater, revealed that no significant TCE degradation was observed in the presence of Na2SO4, CaCl2, and NaHCO3. Partial TCE degradation (28.4%) was observed in 500 mM NaCl after 21 days, while a similar extent of degradation to that found in the seawater solutions was observed in 50 mM solutions of magnesium salts (MgCl2 and MgSO4). Results of open circuit potential analysis suggested that the Fe-0 corrosion potential was not a key determinant of extent of TCE reduction since the corrosion potential decreased to levels similar to that of Fe-0/Fe2+ in the presence of all salts examined Lower final pH values and higher dissolved Fe(II) concentrations were observed in the presence of magnesium salts compared to other salts. Formation of the surface complex >FeOMg+ was identified as being critical to protonation of surface sites, reductive dissolution of the passivating Fe(III) oxyhydroxide layer coating the underlying Fe-0 and enhancement in extent of TCE reduction. These findings provide insight into the molecular scale mechanism of depassivation of aged Fe-0 by inorganic salts with particular implications for the Fe-0-mediated degradation of contaminants in saline natural waters such as seawater and salines groundwaters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据