4.8 Article

Green Rust Formation during Fe(II) Oxidation by the Nitrate-Reducing Acidovorax sp Strain BoFeN1

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 1439-1446

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es2016457

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [KA 1736/14-1]
  2. BMBF/DFG
  3. BMBF IPSWaT
  4. EC2CO-CYTRIX CNRS/INSU
  5. ACI/FNS [3033]
  6. SESAME IdF [1775]
  7. DFG [OB 362/1-1]
  8. INSU
  9. Region Ile-de-France [SESAME 2000 E 1435]
  10. INSU-CNRS
  11. INP-CNRS
  12. University Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green rust (GR) as highly reactive iron mineral potentially plays a key role for the fate of (in)organic contaminants, such as chromium or arsenic, and nitroaromatic compounds functioning both as sorbent and reductant. GR forms as corrosion product of steel but is also naturally present in hydromorphic soils and sediments forming as metastable intermediate during microbial Fe(III) reduction. Although already suggested to form during microbial Fe(II) oxidation, clear evidence for GR formation during microbial Fe(II) oxidation was lacking. In the present study, powder XRD, synchrotron-based XAS, Mossbauer spectroscopy, and TEM demonstrated unambiguously the formation of GR as an intermediate product during Fe(11) oxidation by the nitrate-reducing Fe(II)-oxidizer Acidovorax sp. strain BoFeN1. The spatial distribution and Fe redox-state of the precipitates associated with the cells were visualized by STXM. It showed the presence of extracellular Fe(III), which can be explained by Fe(III) export from the cells or extracellular Fe(II) oxidation by an oxidant diffusing from the cells. Moreover, GR can be oxidized by nitrate/nitrite and is known as a catalyst for oxidation of dissolved Fe(II) by nitrite/nitrate and may thus contribute to the production of extracellular Fe(III). As a result, strain BoFeN1 may contribute to Fe(II) oxidation and nitrate reduction both by an direct enzymatic pathway and an indirect GR-mediated process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据