4.8 Article

Toluene Depletion in Produced Oil Contributes to Souring Control in a Field Subjected to Nitrate Injection

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 46, 期 2, 页码 1285-1292

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es203748b

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSERC Industrial Research Chair
  2. Aramco Services
  3. Baker Hughes Incorporated
  4. British Petroleum
  5. Intertek/CML
  6. Computer Modelling Group Limited
  7. ConocoPhillips Company
  8. YPF SA
  9. Shell Canada Limited
  10. Suncor Energy Developments Inc.
  11. Yara International ASA
  12. Alberta Innovates-Energy and Environment Solutions
  13. Genome Canada
  14. Genome Alberta
  15. Government of Alberta
  16. Genome BC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Souring in the Medicine Hat Glauconitic C field, which has a low bottom-hole temperature (30 degrees C), results from the presence of 0.8 mM sulfate in the injection water. Inclusion of 2 mM nitrate to decrease souring results in zones of nitrate-reduction, sulfate-reduction, and methanogenesis along the injection water flow path. Microbial community analysis by pyrosequencing indicated dominant community members in each of these zones. Nitrate breakthrough was observed in 2-PW, a major water- and sulfide-producing well, after 4 years of injection. Sulfide concentrations at four other production wells (PWs) also reached zero, causing the average sulfide concentration in 14 PWs to decrease significantly. Interestingly, oil produced by 2-PW was depleted of toluene, the preferred electron donor for nitrate reduction. 2-PW and other PWs with zero sulfide produced 95% water and 5% oil. At 2 mM nitrate and 5 mM toluene, respectively, this represents an excess of electron acceptor over electron donor. Hence, continuous nitrate injection can change the composition of produced oil and nitrate breakthrough is expected first in PWs with a low oil to water ratio, because oil from these wells is treated on average with more nitrate than is oil from PWs with a high oil to water ratio.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据