4.8 Article

Redox Reactions of Reduced Flavin Mononucleotide (FMN), Riboflavin (RBF), and Anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS) with Ferrihydrite and Lepidocrocite

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 46, 期 21, 页码 11644-11652

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es301544b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Basic Energy Science, U.S. Department of Energy
  2. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Scientific Focus Area (PNNL SFA)
  3. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
  4. BER at PNNL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flavins are secreted by the dissimilatory iron-reducing bacterium Shewanella and can function as endogenous electron transfer mediators. To assess the potential importance of flavins in Fe(III) bioreduction, we investigated the redox reaction kinetics of reduced flavin mononucleotide, (i.e., FMNH2) and reduced riboflavin (i.e., RBFH2) with ferrihydrite and lepidocrocite. The organic reductants rapidly reduced and dissolved ferrihydrite and lepidocrocite in the pH range 4-8. The rate constant k for 2-line ferrihydrite reductive dissolution by FMNH2 was 87.5 +/- 3.5 M-1. s(-1) at pH 7.0 in batch reactors, and k was similar for RBFH2. For lepidocrocite, k was 500 +/- 61 M-1.s(-1) for FMNH2 and 236 +/- 22 M-1 . s(-1) for RBFH2. The surface area normalized initial reaction rates (r(a)) were between 0.08 and 77 mu mol.m(-2).s(-1) for various conditions in stopped flow experiments. Initial rates (r(o)) were first order with respect to iron(III) oxide concentration, and r(a) increased with decreasing pH. Poorly crystalline 2-line ferrihydrite yielded the highest r(a), followed by more crystalline 6-line ferrihydrite and crystalline lepidocrocite. Compared to a previous whole-cell study with Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1, our findings suggest that the reduction of electron transfer mediators by the Mtr (i.e., metal-reducing) pathway coupled to lactate oxidation is rate limiting, rather than heterogeneous electron transfer to the iron(III) oxide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据