4.8 Article

Attachment Efficiency of Nanoparticle Aggregation in Aqueous Dispersions: Modeling and Experimental Validation

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 46, 期 13, 页码 7054-7062

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es203623z

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [RD-83385601]
  2. Engineering Research Center (ERC)/Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC)/ESH [425.025]
  3. Brook Byers Institute for Sustainable Systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To describe the aggregation kinetics of nanoparticles (NPs) in aqueous dispersions, a new equation for predicting the attachment efficiency is presented. The rationale is that at nanoscale, random kinetic motion may supersede the role of interaction energy in governing the aggregation kinetics of NPs, and aggregation could occur exclusively among the fraction of NPs with the minimum kinetic energy that exceeds the interaction energy barrier (E-b). To justify this rationale, we examined the evolution of particle size distribution (PSD) and frequency distribution during aggregation, and further derived the new equation of attachment efficiency on the basis of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution and Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory. The new equation was evaluated through aggregation experiments with CeO2 NPs using time-resolved-dynamic light scattering (TR-DLS). Our results show that the prediction of the attachment efficiencies agreed remarkably well with experimental data and also correctly described the effects of ionic strength, natural organic matter (NOM), and temperature on attachment efficiency. Furthermore, the new equation was used to describe the attachment efficiencies of different types of engineered NPs selected from the literature and most of the fits showed good agreement with the inverse stability ratios (1/W) and experimentally derived results, although some minor discrepancies were present. Overall, the new equation provides an alternative theoretical approach in addition to 1/W for predicting attachment efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据