4.8 Article

Spatiotemporal Patterns and Ecophysiology of Toxigenic Microcystis Blooms in Lake Taihu, China: Implications for Water Quality Management

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 46, 期 6, 页码 3480-3488

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es2041288

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41171368]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [2010T2Z37]
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) [ENG/CBET-0826819, OCE-0825466]
  4. NSF East Asia and Pacific Summer Institute (EAPSI) [OISE-0913942]
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  6. Directorate For Engineering [0826819] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whole lake monitoring of hypertrophic Lake Taihu, China, was conducted during the summers of 2009-2010, with the intent of identifying environmental factors influencing Microcystis bloom formation and promoting the growth of toxigenic strains (mcyE possessing). Low N:P ratios (replete N & P) appeared to select for toxigenic populations of Microcystis spp., whereas nontoxic Microcystis spp. strains were dominant in more nutrient limited regions of the lake. Chlorophyll a (Adj. R-2 = 0.83, p < 0.0001) was equally predicative of microcystin variance across the lake as fluorescence based realtime quantitative PCR (qPCR) measurements of microcystin synthetase E (mcyE) gene equivalents (Adj. R-2 = 0.85, p < 0.0001). Interestingly, chlorophyll a was identified as a more robust and useful metric for predicting microcystin concentrations than qPCR measurements enumerating the total Microcystis population based on c-phycocyanin (alpha subunit; cpcA) gene equivalents (Adj. R-2 = 0.61, p < 0.0001). Overall, the lakewide composition of Microcystis spp. was highly variable over time and space, and on average the population consisted of 36 +/- 12% potentially toxic cells. On the basis of this study's findings, a framework for the design and implementation of a water safety plan for Taihu water quality managers and public health officials is proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据