4.8 Article

Distribution and Trophic Transfer of Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in an Aquatic Ecosystem Receiving Effluents from a Sewage Treatment Plant

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 45, 期 13, 页码 5529-5535

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es200895b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB421605]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [21007078, 21007085, 21077114, 20890111]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-YW-QN409]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20090460544, 201003166]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) are an extremely complex group of industrial chemicals and found to be potential persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and thus have attracted extensive concern worldwide. In this study, influent, effluent, and sludge were collected from a large sewage treatment plant (STP) in Beijing, China. Water, sediment, and aquatic species were also collected from a recipient lake that receives effluents discharged from the STP. These samples were then analyzed to investigate the effect of STP effluent on distribution and trophic transfer of SCCPs in the local aquatic ecosystem. Concentrations of total SCCPs (Sigma SCCPs) in lake water and surface sediments were found in the range 162-176 ng/L and 1.1-8.7 mu g/g (dry weight, dw), respectively. Vertical concentration profiles of sediment cores showed Sigma SCCPs decreased exponentially with increasing depth. Specific congener composition analysis in sediment layers indicated possible in situ biodegradation might be occurring. High bioaccumulation of SCCPs was observed in the sampled aquatic species. The bioaccumulation factor (BAF) generally increased with the number of chlorines in the SCCP congeners. A significantly positive correlation between lipid-normalized Sigma SCCPs concentration and trophic levels (R-2 = 0.65, p < 0.05) indicate that SCCPs can biomagnify through the food chain in the effluent-receiving aquatic ecosystem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据