4.8 Article

Effectiveness of Ozonation Treatment in Eliminating Toxicity of Oil Sands Process-Affected Water to Chironomus dilutus

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 486-493

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es202415g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alberta Water Research Institute [C4288]
  2. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada [326415-07]
  3. Western Economic Diversification Canada [6578, 6807]
  4. Helmoltz-Alberta (HAI) Initiative
  5. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  6. Canada Research Chair program
  7. Department of Biology and Chemistry
  8. State Key Laboratory in Marine Pollution, City University of Hong Kong
  9. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  10. King Saud University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water soluble organic compounds (OCs), including naphthenic acids (NAs), are potentially toxic constituents of oil sands process-affected water (OSPW) that is generated during extraction of bitumen from Alberta oil sands. Ozonation can decrease concentrations of OCs in OSPW. However, effects of ozonated-OSPW on multicellular organisms are unknown. A 10-day and a chronic exposure of Chironomus dilutus to OSPW were conducted to assess effects on survival, growth, development, and behavior. Two separate batches of OSPW were treated with 30 or 80 mg ozone (O-3)/L. Wet body masses of larvae exposed to OSPW were 64 to 77% less than their respective controls (p < 0.001). However, both levels of ozonation significantly attenuated effects of OSPW on growth. Similarly, chronic exposure to untreated OSPW resulted in significantly less pupation than in the controls, with 31% and 71% less pupation of larvae exposed to the two batches of OSPW (p < 0.05). Emergence was significantly less for larvae exposed to OSPW, with 13% and 8% of larvae emerging, compared to 81% in controls (p < 0.0001). Both levels of zonation of OSPW attenuated effects on emergence. These results suggest that OCs degraded by ozonation causes toxicity of OSPW toward C. dilutus, and that ozonation attenuates toxicity of OSPW.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据