4.8 Article

Silver Nanoparticles and Total Aerosols Emitted by Nanotechnology-Related Consumer Spray Products

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 45, 期 24, 页码 10713-10719

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es202770m

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  2. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under NSF [EF-0830093]
  3. Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology (CEINT)
  4. Virginia Tech's Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science (ICTAS)
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [830093] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Products containing silver nanoparticles are entering the market rapidly, but little is known about the potential for inhalation exposure to nanosilver. The objectives of this work were to characterize the emissions of airborne particles from consumer products that claim to contain silver nanoparticles or ions, determine the relationship between emissions and the products' liquid characteristics, and assess the potential for inhalation exposure to silver during product use. Three products were investigated: an antiodor spray for hunters, a surface disinfectant, and a throat spray. Products emitted 0.24-56 ng of silver in aerosols per spray action. The plurality of silver was found in aerosols 1-2.5 mu m in diameter for two products. Both the products' liquid characteristics and the bottles' spray mechanisms played roles in determining the size distribution of total aerosols, and the size of silver-containing aerosols emitted by the products was largely independent of the silver size distributions in the liquid phase. Silver was associated with chlorine in most samples. Results demonstrate that the normal use of silver-containing spray products carries the potential for inhalation of silver-containing aerosols. Exposure modeling suggests that up to 70 ng of silver may deposit in the respiratory tract during product use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据