4.8 Article

Long-Term Measurements of NO3 Radical at a Semiarid Urban Site: 2. Seasonal Trends and Loss Mechanisms

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 44, 期 15, 页码 5901-5907

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es100967z

关键词

-

资金

  1. GIF [I-776-288/2003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study is the first to present long-term measurements of the nitrate radical in an urban location. Extensive nitrate radical measurements were conducted together with ancillary parameters during a continuous two year campaign (2005-2007) in the semiarid location of Jerusalem. The average nighttime NO3 concentration was 27.3 +/- 43.5 ppt, the highest ever reported, with a seasonal average peak during summer (33.3 +/- 55.8 pptv) with maximum levels exceeding 800 pptv. Significant diurnal changes in NO3 concentrations were observed, caused by an unusual nighttime increase in ozone concentrations. The NO3 loss processes exhibited strong seasonal variability. Homogeneous gas-phase losses were the main removal processes during summer and spring. The heterogeneous losses of N2O5, averaged over the entire campaign, contributed to less than half of the direct losses even though they dominated the winter seasons and part of the autumn months. Statistical regression analysis showed that NO3 was inversely correlated with relative humidity and positively correlated with temperature and to a lesser extent with NO2 and O-3, indicating that the heterogeneous removal processes were also important The diurnal behavior of NO3 was examined using a one-dimensional chemical transport model. The simulations showed that NO3 trends and concentrations were influenced mainly by changes in ozone and nitrogen oxide levels and that the very high levels of NO3 can be explained by the entrainment of fresh ozone from the upper atmospheric levels. After sunset and in the early morning, the homogeneous processes are the major loss pathways, while the heterogeneous N2O5 removal pathway dominates the intermediate times.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据