4.8 Article

Emission Factors of Particulate Matter and Elemental Carbon for Crop Residues and Coals Burned in Typical Household Stoves in China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 44, 期 18, 页码 7157-7162

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es101313y

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40730737, 140710019001]
  2. National Basic Research Program [2007CB407301]
  3. Ministry of Environmental Protection [200809101]
  4. NIEHS [P42 ES016465]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both particulate matter (PM) and black carbon (BC) impact climate change and human health. Uncertainties in emission inventories of PM and BC are partially due to large variation of measured emission factors (EFs) and lack of EFs from developing countries. Although there is a debate whether thermal-optically measured elemental carbon (EC) may be referred to as BC, EC is often treated as the same mass of BC. In this study, EFs of PM (EFPM) and EC (EFEC) for 9 crop residues and 5 coals were measured in actual rural cooking and coal stoves using the carbon mass balance method. The dependence of the EFs on fuel properties and combustion conditions was investigated. It was found that the mean EFPM were 8.19 +/- 4.27 and 3.17 +/- 4.67 g/kg and the mean EFEC were 1.38 +/- 0.70 and 0.23 +/- 0.36 g/kg for crop residues and coals, respectively. PM with size less than 10 mu m (PM10) from crop residues were dominated by particles of aerodynamic size ranging from 0.7 to 2.1 mu m, while the most abundant size ranges of PM10 from coals were either from 0.7 to 2.1 pin or less than 0.7 mu m. Of various fuel properties and combustion conditions tested, fuel moisture and modified combustion efficiency (MCE) were the most critical factors affecting EFPM and EFEC for crop residues. For coal combustion, EFPM were primarily affected by MCE and volatile matter, whereas EFEC were significantly influenced by ash content, volatile matter, heat value, and MCE. It was also found that EC emissions were significantly correlated with emissions of PM with size less than 0.4 mu m.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据