4.8 Article

Estimation of PCB Stocks, Emissions, and Urban Fate: Will our Policies Reduce Concentrations and Exposure?

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 44, 期 8, 页码 2777-2783

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es9012036

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Premier's Research Excellence Award
  3. Great Lakes Atmospheric Deposition Fund (GLAD)
  4. Ontario Ministry of Environment, Canada
  5. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PCBs, used to manage risks from the flammability of dielectric fluids and to increase the durability of elastic sealants, had declining environmental concentrations after legislation banning new production was passed during the 1970s and 1980s in Europe and North America. To answer why PCB temporal trends are now nearly stable and if current policies will further reduce concentrations and our exposure, we estimated PCB stocks in Toronto, Canada (population of similar to 2.5 million) of 437 (282-796) tonnes, of which 97 and 3% are in closed sources and building sealants, respectively. The greatest geographic density of PCBs is downtown, specifically in commercial, electricity-intensive skyscrapers. An unknown stock is within now-buried landfills and other waste-handling facilities as well as diffuse sources such as electrical wiring and paints. Using the Multimedia Urban Model, we estimated city-wide emissions of similar to 0.14-1.4 mg m(-2) y(-1) or 35-350 mg capita(-1) y(-1) of Sigma PCB70, which is similar to 0.01-0.3% annually of total documented stocks. Canada, as one of 159 signatories of the Stockholm Convention and the 35 parties that have reported progress toward environmentally sound management of their PCB inventories by 2028, has passed national legislation with a timetable of inventory reductions. It is unclear whether this legislation will successfully reduce concentrations and exposures, however the analysis should inform our management of other contaminants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据